Skip to content

Structures and Small Molecule Inhibitors in Cellular and Animal Models

My WordPress Blog

Menu
  • Sample Page
Menu

Labeling of lipids in cultures of glioma progenitors expressing IDH1R132H was minimally influenced by introduction of human GLUD1

Posted on November 3, 2021 by president2010

Labeling of lipids in cultures of glioma progenitors expressing IDH1R132H was minimally influenced by introduction of human GLUD1. demonstrate that exerts a growth-inhibitory effect that is paralleled by deficiency in metabolic flux from glucose and glutamine to lipids. Examining human gliomas, we find that glutamate dehydrogenase 1 (GLUD1) and GLUD2 are overexpressed in mutation on metabolic flux and tumor growth. Further, we report that glutamate, a substrate of GLUD2 and a neurotransmitter abundant in mammalian neocortex, can support growth of glioma progenitor cells irrespective of mutation status. These findings suggest that specialization of human neocortex for high glutamate neurotransmitter flux creates a metabolic niche conducive to growth of mutant tumors. Malignant transformation is widely recognized to require metabolic reprogramming to enable rapid expansion of biomass (1). Reports that mutation or overexpression of metabolic enzymes can drive oncogenesis have spurred intense investigation into metabolic vulnerabilities that distinguish malignant and normal tissue (2); however, the extent to which Isoconazole nitrate specialized metabolism of normal differentiated tissues cooperates with particular oncogenes to facilitate tumor growth has largely escaped notice (3, 4). Glioblastoma (GBM) is a highly aggressive brain malignancy and, until recently, all oncogenes identified in this tumor type constitute components of growth factor signaling pathways that activate anabolic processes. The discovery that mutation of isocitrate dehydrogenase Trp53 1 (mutation promotes an undifferentiated phenotype (10, 11), the role of mutant enzyme in tumor growth is not clear (12, 13). Because mutation on glioma lines must be interpreted with caution. Herein, to gain greater understanding of the mechanisms by which mutation. Because the majority of and display proneural gene expression signature (16), we chose for study a model system of or Nestin-tva mice formed gliomas with 100% penetrance following infection with replication-competent avian sarcoma leukosis virus long terminal repeat with splice acceptor (RCAS) vector encoding PDGF-B (PDGF/RCAS) and subsequent implantation into forebrain of immunocompromised mice (Fig. 1or neural stem cultures expressing PDGF-B or human IDH1R132H (hIDH1R132H). ND, not determined. (and 0.005, ** 0.0005 vs. control, test. (and and human gliomas maintain normal concentrations of -KG but have not identified a mechanism that compensates for diverted flux of -KG into 2-HG (8, 9, 18, 19). In human tumors, mutations in and Isoconazole nitrate are mutually exclusive and invariably heterozygous (7). To examine whether human gliomas up-regulate expression of WT IDH enzymes to negate growth-inhibitory effect of mutant enzyme, we compared expression profiling data from three series of histologically matched and high-grade gliomas. Our analysis revealed no increase in mRNA signals for IDH1, IDH2, or IDH3 subunits in tumors (Fig. 2gliomas, the only probesets corresponding to enzymes were ones annotated as glutamate dehydrogenase 1 (GLUD1) and glutamate dehydrogenase 2 (GLUD2) (Fig. 2GBM relative to GBM (Fig. 2glioma, we examined effects of shRNA to GLUD1/2 on orthotopic grafts of an human glioma line. Two shRNA targeting constructs to GLUD1/2 were used: sh647, which elicited partial reduction of GLUD1/2 protein, and sh662, which resulted in nearly complete elimination of detectable GLUD1/2 protein (Fig. 2and Fig. S2). In addition, sh662-expressing grafts displayed reduction of apparent tumor cell density in H&E-stained sections (Fig. 2and Table S1). These results reveal a dependence of tumor growth on GLUD1 and/or GLUD2 but do not reveal the relative contributions of each of these highly homologous proteins to tumor growth. Open in a separate window Fig. 2. GLUD1 and GLUD2 are overexpressed in human GBM, and knockdown of GLUD1/2 inhibits orthotopic growth of an glioma line. (value less than 1 10?4 (test) in each of three separate Isoconazole nitrate comparisons of vs. high-grade glioma. Values reported represent mean fold change and value for three comparisons. (vs. GBM. (human glioma line BT142. ( 0.05, ** 0.0001, with comparison with shCtr. ( 0.05, ** 0.005, *** 0.0005, for comparison with shCtr, test. AUC, area under the curve. (See Table S1 for all metabolites profiled.) GLUD1 and GLUD2 are mitochondrial enzymes that catalyze the conversion of glutamate to -KG and lie immediately upstream from IDH1 and/or IDH2 in a reductive glutaminolysis pathway critical for lipogenesis and growth under conditions of hypoxia or mitochondrial dysfunction (20C22). To determine whether either GLUD1 or GLUD2 rescues.

Recent Posts

  • The assay was performed once in triplicate, and the results are expressed as mean % neutralization values for each rabbit
  • rgH3N2: 6:2 reassortant with WT HA and NA of A/Switzerland/2013
  • Purification of monoclonal anti-MAp19 antibodies == The anti-MAp19 antibodies were purified on Protein L agarose (Sigma)
  • DISCUSSION == These findings demonstrate high MERSCoVspecific neutralizing antibody titres suggest that MERSCoV, or a related virus, has circulated through dromedary camels in Israel, extending the known geographic range of MERSCoV circulation in camels
  • It is suggested the combined ammonium sulfate precipitation and ion-exchange chromatography process effectively removed residual proteins in the final camel IgG preparation and can be a suitable method for large-scale refinement of therapeutic camel antivenoms

Recent Comments

  1. A WordPress Commenter on Hello world!

Archives

  • June 2025
  • May 2025
  • April 2025
  • March 2025
  • February 2025
  • January 2025
  • December 2024
  • November 2024
  • October 2024
  • September 2024
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021

Categories

  • Acetylcholine ??7 Nicotinic Receptors
  • Acetylcholine Nicotinic Receptors
  • Acyltransferases
  • Alpha1 Adrenergic Receptors
  • Angiotensin Receptors, Non-Selective
  • APJ Receptor
  • Calcium Channels
  • Carrier Protein
  • cMET
  • COX
  • DAT
  • Decarboxylases
  • Dipeptidyl Peptidase IV
  • DP Receptors
  • FFA1 Receptors
  • GlyR
  • H1 Receptors
  • HDACs
  • Hsp90
  • IGF Receptors
  • LXR-like Receptors
  • Miscellaneous Glutamate
  • Neurokinin Receptors
  • Nicotinic Acid Receptors
  • Nitric Oxide, Other
  • NO Synthase, Non-Selective
  • Non-selective Adenosine
  • Nucleoside Transporters
  • Opioid, ??-
  • Oxidative Phosphorylation
  • p70 S6K
  • PI 3-Kinase
  • Platelet-Activating Factor (PAF) Receptors
  • Potassium (KV) Channels
  • Potassium Channels, Non-selective
  • Prostanoid Receptors
  • Protein Ser/Thr Phosphatases
  • PTP
  • Retinoid X Receptors
  • Serotonin (5-ht1E) Receptors
  • Shp2
  • Sigma1 Receptors
  • Signal Transducers and Activators of Transcription
  • Sirtuin
  • Syk Kinase
  • T-Type Calcium Channels
  • Ubiquitin E3 Ligases
  • Ubiquitin/Proteasome System
  • Uncategorized
  • Urotensin-II Receptor
  • Vesicular Monoamine Transporters
© 2025 Structures and Small Molecule Inhibitors in Cellular and Animal Models | Powered by Minimalist Blog WordPress Theme