Skip to content

Structures and Small Molecule Inhibitors in Cellular and Animal Models

My WordPress Blog

Menu
  • Sample Page
Menu

Determination of anti-CMV gB antibodies IgG antibodies to CMV gB in the sera of patients were determined by a previously described ELISA [9]

Posted on November 11, 2024 by president2010

Determination of anti-CMV gB antibodies IgG antibodies to CMV gB in the sera of patients were determined by a previously described ELISA [9]. 2.4. CMV in patients with breast cancer. Keywords: GM allotypes, decoy Fc receptor, cytomegalovirus, immunoevasion 1. Introduction Human cytomegalovirus (CMV), a common herpesvirus, has been implicated in the etiopathogenesis of many diseases, including breast cancer. One study found the evidence of viral expression in over 97% of neoplastic breast epithelium [1]. These findings were confirmed and extended in another investigation, which found 100% of primary breast cancer samples to be CMV positive, and also detected virus protein expression in neoplastic cells in sentinel lymph node metastases of breast cancer [2]. If CMV were involved in breast cancer pathogenesis, a strong immunological response to the virus by the host would be expected to be protective. To test this possibility, we characterized a large multiethnic cohort of patients with breast cancer and matched controls for antibodies to CMV glycoprotein B (gB), which is required for viral infectivity and plays an important role in viral attachment and entry. Results showed that cancer-free individuals had significantly higher levels of naturally occurring anti-gB IgG antibodies than patients with breast cancer. There was significant interindividual and interethnic variability in the magnitude of antibody responsiveness, and complex interactions between certain genes of the immune system contributed to this variability in both patients and controls [3]. The aim of the present investigation was to gain further mechanistic insights into the complex interplay between the virus and the immune system. In previous studies, we have shown that two CMV-encoded Fc receptors (FcR), which the virus uses to evade BMS-986158 Fc-mediated effector functions [4,5], bind differentially to non-immune IgG1 proteins expressing different immunoglobulin GM ( marker) allotypes, genetic markers of IgG [6,7]. Here, we evaluated whether allotypically disparate, affinity purified anti-gB BMS-986158 IgG antibodies from patients with breast cancer bind differentially to the decoy FcR encoded by the CMV gene genes on chromosome 14. They are localized on the constant region of 1 1, 2, and 3 chains. IgG1 markers GM 3 and 17 (arginine to lysine), were genotyped by a pre-designed TaqMan? genotyping assay from Applied Biosystems Inc. (Foster City, CA), employing the following primers and probes: Forward primer: 5 CCCAGACCTACATCTGCAACGTGA-3 Reverse primer: 5 CTGCCCTGGACTGGGACTGCAT-3 Reporter 1 (GM 17-specific): VIC-CTCTCACCAACTTTCTTGT-NFQ Reporter 2 (GM 3-specific): FAM-CTCTCACCAACTCTCTTGT-NFQ IgG2 markers GM 23? and 23+ (valine to methionine), were genotyped by a TaqMan? genotyping assay from Applied Biosystems Inc., employing the following primers and probes: Forward primer: 5 CCCGAGGTCCAGTTCAACT-3 Reverse primer: 5 CGTGGCTTTGTCTTGGCATTATG-3 Reporter 1 (GM 23-specific): VIC-CACCTCCACGCCGTC-NFQ Reporter 2 (GM 23+specific): FAM- CACCTCCATGCCGTC -NFQ For the determination of IgG3 markers GM 5 and 21, a previously described PCR-RFLP method was used [8]. 2.3. Determination of anti-CMV gB antibodies IgG antibodies to CMV gB in the sera of patients were determined by a previously described ELISA [9]. 2.4. Affinity purification of anti-gB IgG1 antibodies expressing GM 3 or GM 17 allotypes Sera from 17 subjects who were homozygous for either GM 3 or GM 17 allele, and who had high titers (> BMS-986158 1:400) of antibodies to CMV gB, were used for affinity purifications. Briefly, 1 ml of serum from each individual was mixed with 4 ml of PBS and subjected to 40% ammonium Rabbit Polyclonal to CDK7 sulfate fractionation. The contents were centrifuged and dialyzed against acetate buffer (pH 4.5), and the precipitated protein (predominantly serum albumin) was removed, with the contents then being further dialyzed against PBS. CMV gB (Sino Biological) was coupled to Pierce? NHS-activated magnetic beads according to the manufacturers protocol. The total IgG was passed through this column BMS-986158 and washed. The bound proteins were then eluted with glycine HCl buffer (pH 2.5), neutralized with 1M Tris HCl (pH 8.00), and concentrated. The preparation was passed repeatedly through beads coupled with a mixture of anti-human IgG2, IgG3 and IgG4, to remove the antibodies of these subclasses from the preparation. (For IgG Fc-viral FcR binding studies, it is necessary to use affinity purified IgG antibodies, which would ensure that any interaction between the CMV FcR proteins and IgG antibodies involves the portion of the IgG molecule.

Recent Posts

  • The assay was performed once in triplicate, and the results are expressed as mean % neutralization values for each rabbit
  • rgH3N2: 6:2 reassortant with WT HA and NA of A/Switzerland/2013
  • Purification of monoclonal anti-MAp19 antibodies == The anti-MAp19 antibodies were purified on Protein L agarose (Sigma)
  • DISCUSSION == These findings demonstrate high MERSCoVspecific neutralizing antibody titres suggest that MERSCoV, or a related virus, has circulated through dromedary camels in Israel, extending the known geographic range of MERSCoV circulation in camels
  • It is suggested the combined ammonium sulfate precipitation and ion-exchange chromatography process effectively removed residual proteins in the final camel IgG preparation and can be a suitable method for large-scale refinement of therapeutic camel antivenoms

Recent Comments

  1. A WordPress Commenter on Hello world!

Archives

  • June 2025
  • May 2025
  • April 2025
  • March 2025
  • February 2025
  • January 2025
  • December 2024
  • November 2024
  • October 2024
  • September 2024
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021

Categories

  • Acetylcholine ??7 Nicotinic Receptors
  • Acetylcholine Nicotinic Receptors
  • Acyltransferases
  • Alpha1 Adrenergic Receptors
  • Angiotensin Receptors, Non-Selective
  • APJ Receptor
  • Calcium Channels
  • Carrier Protein
  • cMET
  • COX
  • DAT
  • Decarboxylases
  • Dipeptidyl Peptidase IV
  • DP Receptors
  • FFA1 Receptors
  • GlyR
  • H1 Receptors
  • HDACs
  • Hsp90
  • IGF Receptors
  • LXR-like Receptors
  • Miscellaneous Glutamate
  • Neurokinin Receptors
  • Nicotinic Acid Receptors
  • Nitric Oxide, Other
  • NO Synthase, Non-Selective
  • Non-selective Adenosine
  • Nucleoside Transporters
  • Opioid, ??-
  • Oxidative Phosphorylation
  • p70 S6K
  • PI 3-Kinase
  • Platelet-Activating Factor (PAF) Receptors
  • Potassium (KV) Channels
  • Potassium Channels, Non-selective
  • Prostanoid Receptors
  • Protein Ser/Thr Phosphatases
  • PTP
  • Retinoid X Receptors
  • Serotonin (5-ht1E) Receptors
  • Shp2
  • Sigma1 Receptors
  • Signal Transducers and Activators of Transcription
  • Sirtuin
  • Syk Kinase
  • T-Type Calcium Channels
  • Ubiquitin E3 Ligases
  • Ubiquitin/Proteasome System
  • Uncategorized
  • Urotensin-II Receptor
  • Vesicular Monoamine Transporters
© 2025 Structures and Small Molecule Inhibitors in Cellular and Animal Models | Powered by Minimalist Blog WordPress Theme