Skip to content

Structures and Small Molecule Inhibitors in Cellular and Animal Models

My WordPress Blog

Menu
  • Sample Page
Menu

Our approach detects relevant individual differences in functional interactions between leukemia and stromal cells, which has important implications for preclinical research

Posted on May 10, 2026 by president2010

Our approach detects relevant individual differences in functional interactions between leukemia and stromal cells, which has important implications for preclinical research. == RESULTS == == Bone marrow mesenchymal stromal cells support primary ALL viability through heterogeneous mechanisms == Bone marrow derived, hTERT-immortalized Rabbit Polyclonal to Tau (phospho-Ser516/199) MSC have been established to support leukemia cell lines survival in a model of the leukemia microenvironment [12]. new opportunities to develop more personalized approaches to leukemia treatment. Keywords:acute lymphoblastic leukemia, bone marrow stroma, microenvironment, oxidative stress, RNAi screen == INTRODUCTION == Acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) is the most common malignancy in childhood. The treatment of ALL is very effective, but the management of relapsed or refractory disease remains challenging [1]. Leukemia cells subvert normal hematopoietic stem cell niches, which provide protective cues to promote leukemia survival and disease propagation [2]. The intercellular crosstalk between leukemia cells and their microenvironment influences the biology of the disease and could contribute to drug resistancein vivo[34]. The cellular composition of the leukemia niche and the nature of the protective mechanisms between niche components remain poorly understood. The discovery of leukemia-specific conversation patterns between leukemia and niche cells will provide new targets to fight disease recurrence and improve the therapeutic window between leukemia cells and their normal counterpart. Important components of the hematopoietic niche derive from skeletal stem cells in the bone marrow [57]. Evidence from mouse models indicates that these mesenchymal stem cells support normal hematopoiesis in the perivascular space [78], and the presence of specific niches for cells in distinct says of hematopoietic diffentiation was suggested [8]. Indeed, normal hematopoietic stem cells were shown to reside in a perivascular niche, while more mature lymphoid progenitors were found at endosteal niches [910]. Some molecular factors that JDTic contribute as niche factors to normal hematopoietic stem cell physiology have recently been identified [8]. In contrast, the molecular mechanisms that contribute specifically to ALL survival have remained elusive so far.In vitromodels have employed explanted human bone marrow mesenchymal stromal cells (MSC) to support long term cultures of ALL cells [1112]. These MSC are able to reconstitute functional hematopoietic nichesin vivoafter xenotransplantation [1314]. Taking advantage of the leukemia-supporting function of MSC in vitro, we developed an image-based RNAi screening platform for functional genomic interrogation of the intercellular crosstalk between leukemia and bone marrow derived MSC. Our recently established xenograft model of ALL enabled systematic functional evaluation of patient derived primary leukemia samples [1516]. Using a candidate gene approach, we identified patient specific patterns of dependence on stromal gene expression, involving multiple pathways. The most detrimental effect on leukemia survival JDTic was achieved by down-regulation of stromal solute carrier family 3 member 2 (SLC3A2), a subunit of the cystine transporter xc. The survival of a subset of ALL samples was critically dependent on metabolic support from stromal cells, mediated by this amino acid transporter. We demonstrate that this protective mechanism involved stromal production of cysteine to maintain glutathione levels in leukemia cells, which results in protection from oxidative stress. Our approach detects relevant individual differences in functional interactions between leukemia and stromal cells, which has important implications for preclinical research. == RESULTS == == Bone marrow mesenchymal stromal cells support primary ALL viability through heterogeneous mechanisms == Bone marrow derived, hTERT-immortalized MSC have been established to support leukemia cell lines survival in a model of the leukemia microenvironment [12]. With the aim to test whether this JDTic system is suitable for functional investigation of critical interactions between primary leukemia and stromal cells, we monitored the survival kinetics of 22 BCP ALL samples on human MSC (Fig.1andSupplemental Table S1). These samples included cases from different prognostic groups based on clinical criteria [17] (Supplemental Table S1). In monocultures, the viability of ALL cells dramatically decreased within 6 days (average residual viability = 6.99% of input) (Fig.1A and B). A marked improvement of ALL cell survival (>50% of input cells after 6 days) was observed in co-cultures with MSC in serum free medium in 19 out of 22 ALL samples (Fig.1A and B). In two cases a marked increase of cell number was observed. To evaluate the relative contribution of direct cell to cell.

Recent Posts

  • Skin cells on a cover slip had been mounted within a chamber and whole cellular currents sized with low Clsolutions to reduce the contribution of flow-stimulated Clcurrents
  • (Portland, OR, USA) and the path and network were studied using Creation Pathway Examination (IPA, www
  • Raffaella Becagli to M
  • Quality control assays include digital microscopy and ThT staining
  • As a result of Protein A capture, the assay fits IgG1, IgG2 (Figure1B) and IgG4 (data not shown)

Recent Comments

  1. A WordPress Commenter on Hello world!

Archives

  • May 2026
  • April 2026
  • March 2026
  • February 2026
  • December 2025
  • November 2025
  • June 2025
  • May 2025
  • April 2025
  • March 2025
  • February 2025
  • January 2025
  • December 2024
  • November 2024
  • October 2024
  • September 2024
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021

Categories

  • Acetylcholine ??7 Nicotinic Receptors
  • Acetylcholine Nicotinic Receptors
  • Acyltransferases
  • Alpha1 Adrenergic Receptors
  • Angiotensin Receptors, Non-Selective
  • APJ Receptor
  • Calcium Channels
  • Carrier Protein
  • cMET
  • COX
  • DAT
  • Decarboxylases
  • Dipeptidyl Peptidase IV
  • DP Receptors
  • FFA1 Receptors
  • GlyR
  • H1 Receptors
  • HDACs
  • Hsp90
  • IGF Receptors
  • LXR-like Receptors
  • Miscellaneous Glutamate
  • Neurokinin Receptors
  • Nicotinic Acid Receptors
  • Nitric Oxide, Other
  • NO Synthase, Non-Selective
  • Non-selective Adenosine
  • Nucleoside Transporters
  • Opioid, ??-
  • Oxidative Phosphorylation
  • p70 S6K
  • PI 3-Kinase
  • Platelet-Activating Factor (PAF) Receptors
  • Potassium (KV) Channels
  • Potassium Channels, Non-selective
  • Prostanoid Receptors
  • Protein Ser/Thr Phosphatases
  • PTP
  • Retinoid X Receptors
  • Serotonin (5-ht1E) Receptors
  • Shp2
  • Sigma1 Receptors
  • Signal Transducers and Activators of Transcription
  • Sirtuin
  • Syk Kinase
  • T-Type Calcium Channels
  • Ubiquitin E3 Ligases
  • Ubiquitin/Proteasome System
  • Uncategorized
  • Urotensin-II Receptor
  • Vesicular Monoamine Transporters
© 2026 Structures and Small Molecule Inhibitors in Cellular and Animal Models | Powered by Minimalist Blog WordPress Theme